# Upgrading to 1.0
AshGraphql 1.0 is a major release that introduces 3.0 support as well as a few
breaking changes for AshGraphql itself.
## `:datetime` is now the default representation for datetimes
For backwards compatibility, pre-1.0 we had users configure `:utc_datetime_type` to `:datetime` as part of the getting started guide. This is now the default. The configuration remains, but has been renamed. It was improperly `config :ash, :utc_datetime_type`, and it is now `config :ash_graphql, :utc_datetime_type`. If you are a user who is relying on the original behavior that had it default to `:naive_datetime`, you can set the following configuration:
```elixir
config :ash_graphql, :utc_datetime_type, :naive_datetime
```
Otherwise, if you have the following in your config, you can remove it.
```elixir
config :ash, :utc_datetime_type, :datetime
```
## `allow_non_null_mutation_arguments?` is now `true` always
You can remove this code from your config.
```elixir
config :ash_graphql, :allow_non_null_mutation_arguments?, true
```
Pre 1.0, the `input` argument for mutations was always allowed to be `null`. In 1.0, it will be required if there are any non-null inputs inside of the object. You may need to address clients that are expecting to be able to send `null`. Even if they _were_ sending `null` in those cases, it would have been an error, so it is unlikely that you will have to make any changes here.
---
## Automagic atom/union/map types are no more
Pre 1.0: AshGraphql automatically generated types for attributes/arguments that were atom/union/map types, giving them a name like `postStatus`, for an attribute `status` on a resource `post`. While convenient, this incurred _significant_ internal complexity, and had room for strange ambiguity. For example, if you had two actions, that each had an argument called `:status`, and that `:status` was an enum with different values, you would get a conflict at compile time due to conflicting type names.
### What you'll need to change
AshGraphql will now _only_ generate types for types defined using `Ash.Type.NewType` or `Ash.Type.Enum`. For example, if you had:
```elixir
attribute :post_status, :atom, constraints: [one_of: [:active, :archived]]
```
in 3.0 this attribute would display as a `:string`. To fix this, you would define an `Ash.Type.Enum`:
```elixir
defmodule MyApp.PostStatus do
use Ash.Type.Enum, values: [:active, :archived]
def graphql_type(_), do: :post_status
def graphql_input_type(_), do: :post_status
end
```
Then you could use it in your attribute:
```elixir
attribute :post_status, MyApp.PostStatus
```
The same goes for map types with the `:fields` constraint, as well as union types, except you must define those using `Ash.Type.NewType`. For example:
```elixir
attribute :scale, :union, constraints: [
types: [
whole: [
type: :integer
],
fractional: [
type: :decimal
]
]
]
```
Here you would get a compile error, indicating that we cannot determine a type for `:union`. To resolve this, you would define an `Ash.Type.NewType`, like so:
```elixir
defmodule MyApp.Scale do
use Ash.Type.NewType, subtype_of: :union, constraints: [
types: [
whole: [
type: :integer
],
fractional: [
type: :decimal
]
]
]
def graphql_type(_), do: :scale
def graphql_input_type(_), do: :scale
end
```
Then you could use it in your application like so:
```elixir
attribute :scale, MyApp.Scale
```
---
## The `managed_relationships.auto?` option now defaults to `true`
Pre 1.0, you would need to either configure managed_relationships manually, for example:
```elixir
managed_relationships do
managed_relationship :create, :comments
end
```
Or set `auto?` to `true`, which would derive appropriate configurations for any action that had arguments with corresponding `manage_relationship` changes for them. This is unnecessarily verbose and there isn't really a time where you wouldn't want an input type derived for an argument that uses `change manage_relationship`, so the default for `auto?` is now `true`. This only affects arguments who's type is `:map`, or `{:array, :map}`.
A new option has been added to `managed_relationship` to allow you to bypass this type generation if necessary:
```elixir
managed_relationships do
managed_relationship :create, :comments, ignore?: true
end
```
## `Ash.Api` is now `Ash.Domain` in Ash 3.0
Your Absinthe schema file (ie. `MyApp.Schema`) will need all references to `api` updated to be `domain`. eg.
```elixir
@domains [MyApp.Domain1, MyApp.Domain2]
use AshGraphql, domains: @domains
```